
Download ISACA COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Exam Dumps to Pass Exam Easily in 2026
Get 100% Real Free COBIT Design and Implementation COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Sample Questions
ISACA COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 59
When tailoring COBIT 2019 to enterprise requirements, which of the following is the PRIMARY objective of preparing a risk profile?
- A. To identify areas of risk that require mitigation
- B. To identify areas of risk that impact business continuity
- C. To identify areas of risk that cause technology disruption
- D. To identify areas of risk that exceed risk appetite
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide:
"A key purpose of defining a risk profile is to compare identified risks with the enterprise's risk appetite. This allows the organization to prioritize areas where risk levels exceed acceptable thresholds and guide risk treatment plans accordingly." The risk profile doesn't just highlight risks in general-it is specifically about those exceeding the enterprise's defined tolerance.
Reference:COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Section 4.4.3
NEW QUESTION # 60
While evaluating the impact of design factors for a COBIT implementation project, which of the following sectors would be considered as operating in a high-compliance environment?
- A. Nonprofit
- B. Financial
- C. Public
- D. Educational
Answer: B
Explanation:
COBIT 2019 explicitly recognizes compliance requirements as a core design factor that significantly influences governance system design. Enterprises operating in highly regulated environments must place stronger emphasis on compliance-related governance and management objectives, controls, and assurance mechanisms.
The Design Guide consistently uses the financial sector as a canonical example of a high-compliance environment due to stringent regulatory oversight related to data protection, financial reporting, risk management, anti-money laundering, and operational resilience. Banks, insurance companies, and investment firms are subject to continuous regulatory scrutiny and mandatory audits, making compliance a dominant governance driver.
While public sector organizations also face regulatory requirements, the level, consistency, and enforcement intensity vary widely by jurisdiction. Educational and nonprofit sectors typically operate under fewer mandatory compliance regimes and therefore are not categorized as high-compliance by default.
COBIT emphasizes that in high-compliance environments, governance design must prioritize objectives related to compliance monitoring, internal control, assurance, and risk optimization. This directly aligns with the characteristics of the financial sector, making it the correct answer.
NEW QUESTION # 61
A CEO of a domestic enterprise plans to expand its operations globally. The CEO has selected enterprise goals using the COBIT goals cascade and has tasked the CIO with tailoring COBIT as required. After selecting the relevant alignment goals, which of the following should be the CIOsNEXTpriority?
- A. Management activities
- B. Management objectives
- C. Design factors
- D. Organizational structure
Answer: C
Explanation:
In the COBIT 2019 framework, after selecting the relevant alignment goals, the CIO's next priority should be identifying and understanding the design factors. Design factors are crucial as they influence the tailoring of the governance system to align with the specific needs and context of the enterprise.
The COBIT 2019 Design Guide emphasizes that design factors impact the governance and management objectives and help in customizing the COBIT framework. The selection and analysis of design factors ensure that the governance system is practical and relevant to the enterprise's environment.
Design Factors in COBIT 2019 include:
* Enterprise Strategy:Different strategies (e.g., growth, innovation, cost leadership) require different governance approaches.
* Enterprise Goals:Aligning IT-related goals with overall enterprise goals.
* Risk Profile:Understanding the risk appetite and tolerance.
* I&T-Related Issues:Identifying issues specific to information and technology.
* Threat Landscape:Assessing external and internal threats.
* Compliance Requirements:Meeting legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations.
* Role of IT:Determining IT's role in the enterprise (e.g., support, factory, turnaround, strategic).
* Sourcing Model:Whether IT services are in-house, outsourced, or a combination.
* IT Implementation Methods:Traditional, agile, or hybrid methods used in IT initiatives.
* Technology Adoption Strategy:How quickly the enterprise adopts new technologies.
* Enterprise Size:The size of the enterprise can affect governance and management practices.
The process of tailoring COBIT involves:
* Analyzing Design Factors:Understanding and documenting the enterprise's design factors.
* Designing the Tailored Governance System:Based on the analyzed design factors, select and
* customize the governance and management objectives.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide References:
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4.This chapter provides an overview of the COBIT goals cascade and the importance of aligning enterprise goals with IT-related goals.
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2.This chapter describes design factors in detail and their role in tailoring the governance system.
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3.This chapter outlines the steps for implementing a tailored COBIT governance system, emphasizing the importance of understanding and leveraging design factors.
Thus, the CIO should prioritize understanding the design factors to ensure the tailored COBIT governance system aligns with the enterprise's specific context and requirements. This approach ensures the governance system is both effective and efficient, addressing the unique challenges and opportunities of the enterprise.
NEW QUESTION # 62
Which of the following would BEST enable the prioritization of governance objectives?
- A. A matrixed scoring methodology
- B. The enterprises risk tolerance
- C. Expected performance outcomes
- D. The IT strategic plan
Answer: A
Explanation:
In COBIT 2019, the prioritization of governance objectives is essential to ensure that the most critical aspects of IT governance receive the necessary focus and resources. A matrixed scoring methodology is considered the best enabler for prioritizing governance objectives because it provides a structured, systematic, and quantifiable approach to evaluating and ranking various governance objectives based on multiple criteria.
Detailed Explanation with References:
* IT Strategic Plan (Option A):
* The IT strategic plan outlines the strategic direction and objectives of IT within the organization.
While it provides guidance on long-term goals and initiatives, it does not offer a detailed mechanism for prioritizing specific governance objectives.
* Matrixed Scoring Methodology (Option B):
* A matrixed scoring methodology allows the organization to evaluate governance objectives against a set of predefined criteria such as strategic alignment, risk impact, resource availability, and expected benefits. This methodology helps in objectively assessing and comparing the importance and urgency of different governance objectives. By assigning scores to each criterion, organizations can create a prioritized list based on overall scores, ensuring that the most critical and impactful objectives are addressed first.
* This approach is comprehensive and takes into account multiple factors, providing a balanced and transparent means of prioritizing objectives. It enables decision-makers to justify their choices and ensures that prioritization is aligned with the organization's strategic goals and risk profile.
* Enterprise's Risk Tolerance (Option C):
* The enterprise's risk tolerance is an important factor in governance decisions, as it defines the level of risk the organization is willing to accept. However, while it influences prioritization, it is not a standalone methodology for prioritizing governance objectives. Risk tolerance must be considered within a broader context of criteria, which a matrixed scoring methodology can effectively encompass.
* Expected Performance Outcomes (Option D):
* Expected performance outcomes are crucial for evaluating the success of governance initiatives, but they do not provide a methodology for prioritizing objectives. They are one of the factors that can be included in a matrixed scoring methodology to assess the potential impact and value of each objective.
Conclusion:The correct answer isB. A matrixed scoring methodology. This method provides a robust, multi-criteria approach to prioritizing governance objectives, ensuring that decisions are made based on a balanced consideration of various relevant factors.
References:
* ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. ISACA.
* ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution.
ISACA.
NEW QUESTION # 63
When considering the technology adoption strategy design factor, and the design factor value is first mover, which of the following should be a governance objective priority?
- A. Ensured resource optimization (EDM04)
- B. Ensured risk optimization (EDM03)
- C. Ensured stakeholder engagement (EDM05)
- D. Ensured benefits delivery (EDM02)
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide:
"A first mover in technology adoption will prioritize benefits realization, ensuring that the value from early adoption is achieved effectively." Thus,Ensured benefits delivery (EDM02)aligns best with a first-mover approach.
Reference:COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Section 4.4.6
NEW QUESTION # 64
Which of the following statements BEST describes the features and properties of the COBIT 2019 governance system design workflow?
- A. When executing the governance system design workflow, design factors that produce inconsistent priorities for governance and management objectives need to be discarded.
- B. The governance system design workflow only considers enterprise goals.
- C. The governance system design workflow allows for consideration of all design factors in order to develop a customized governance system.
- D. When executing the governance system design workflow, reliable results can only be obtained by considering all design factors.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The COBIT 2019 Design Guide explains:
"The governance system design workflow enables the customization of a governance system by considering all relevant design factors. These factors influence the prioritization of governance and management objectives." Discarding inconsistent priorities is not a valid approach, and enterprise goals are only one of many design factors.
Reference:COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Section 3
NEW QUESTION # 65
When considering the threat landscape design factor, and the design factor value is high, which of the following should be a management objective priority?
- A. Managed assurance (MEA04)
- B. Managed operations (DSS01)
- C. Managed innovation (APO04)
- D. Managed service agreements (APO09)
Answer: A
Explanation:
The COBIT 2019 Design Guide explains that when the threat landscape is assessed as high, enterprises must strengthen their ability to monitor, evaluate, and provide independent assurance over governance and management practices. A high threat landscape indicates increased exposure to cyber threats, regulatory scrutiny, operational disruption, or external instability.
In such environments, governance systems must ensure that controls are not only defined but are working effectively and continuously. The management objective MEA04 - Managed Assurance directly addresses this need by establishing mechanisms for independent assurance, audit coordination, and validation of control effectiveness.
While DSS01 (operations) and APO09 (service agreements) are important operational objectives, they do not directly address the governance need for confidence in control effectiveness. APO04 (innovation) is generally deprioritized in high-threat contexts, where stability and risk oversight take precedence.
COBIT explicitly links elevated threats to increased reliance on assurance activities to provide governing bodies with confidence that risks are being managed appropriately. Therefore, MEA04 becomes a priority management objective when the threat landscape is high.
NEW QUESTION # 66
An enterprise will often fail to realize implementation commitments during the execution of an EGIT implementation program plan if it:
- A. Reduces projects into smaller executable pieces.
- B. Focuses on enabling IT value over business value.
- C. Simplifies the implementation process.
- D. Leverages existing mechanisms and ways of working.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide states:
"A key pitfall in EGIT implementation is focusing too much on enabling IT-specific improvements and failing to tie governance outcomes directly to business value realization." Effective EGIT must prioritize how IT contributes to achieving enterprise goals, not just technical or operational improvements.
Reference:COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Common Pitfalls Section
NEW QUESTION # 67
Which of the following is the MOST effective way to gain senior management buy-in and support for an EGIT program?
- A. Establish EGIT as the solution for all IT-related problems.
- B. Require IT management to define the expected value from IT without input from stakeholders.
- C. Make EGIT a discussion issue for the board and related committees.
- D. Encourage the use of short-term solutions to address current IT problems.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide emphasizes the importance of involving senior management and the board in EGIT initiatives:
"Make EGIT a discussion issue for the board and related committees."
Engaging the board and related committees ensures that EGIT is aligned with enterprise goals and receives the necessary support and oversight.
Reference:COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Section 3.3.1
NEW QUESTION # 68
Which of the following domains addresses the integration of I&T solutions with business processes?
- A. Align, Plan and Organize (APO)
- B. Build, Acquire and Implement (BAI)
- C. Monitor, Evaluate and Assess (MEA)
- D. Deliver, Service and Support (DSS)
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Build, Acquire and Implement (BAI) domain in COBIT 2019 explicitly covers the definition, acquisition, development, and integration of I&T solutions into business processes. The Governance and Management Objectives publication describes BAI as the domain responsible for ensuring that solutions are not only built correctly but also integrated effectively into enterprise operations.
While APO focuses on planning and strategy, DSS on service delivery, and MEA on monitoring and assurance, BAI uniquely addresses the transition from design to operational use. Objectives such as Managed Solution Identification and Build (BAI03) and Managed Change Acceptance and Transitioning (BAI07) directly support business process integration.
This domain ensures that business requirements are translated into working solutions that deliver value and align with enterprise objectives. Therefore, BAI is the domain most directly responsible for integrating I&T solutions with business processes.
NEW QUESTION # 69
What group is PRIMARILY responsible for setting the overall direction for IT governance implementation?
- A. Business owners
- B. Key stakeholders
- C. IT management
- D. Enterprise executives
Answer: D
Explanation:
The group primarily responsible for setting the overall direction for IT governance implementation is the enterprise executives. Their role is crucial in aligning IT governance with the strategic goals and vision of the organization.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, EDM01 (Ensure Governance Framework Setting and Maintenance):This objective discusses the responsibilities of enterprise executives in setting the governance framework's direction.
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter highlights the role of senior leadership in driving the implementation of IT governance.
Enterprise executives provide the strategic direction and support necessary to ensure that IT governance aligns with the enterprise's overall mission and objectives.
NEW QUESTION # 70
Which of the following is an important desired outcome to be achieved from the execution of an EGIT implementation program plan?
- A. None of the above
- B. Completion of EGIT project implementation regardless of the amount of time required
- C. Development of a record of unapproved EGIT projects
- D. Transition of EGIT projects into the enterprise's normal development life cycle
Answer: D
Explanation:
"...projects become part of the normal development life cycle and should be governed by established program and project management methods."
NEW QUESTION # 71
The PRIMARY function of COBIT Implementation Phase 7: How Do We Keep the Momentum Going is to provide an opportunity for which of the following?
- A. Closing the loop for communication workflow
- B. Documenting improvements in a prioritized action plan
- C. Ensuring frequent stakeholder communication
Answer: C
Explanation:
The primary function of COBIT Implementation Phase 7: "How Do We Keep the Momentum Going?" is to ensure frequent stakeholder communication. This phase focuses on maintaining engagement and support from stakeholders to sustain the momentum of the governance initiatives.
Ensuring frequent stakeholder communication is essential for maintaining momentum in governance initiatives. This involves regular updates, feedback sessions, and transparent communication to keep stakeholders informed and involved in the ongoing process. It helps to address any concerns, align expectations, and ensure continuous support for the initiatives.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 8:Discusses the importance of continuous communication with stakeholders to keep the momentum going and maintain support for governance initiatives.
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 5:Highlights the need for frequent and effective communication to ensure that stakeholders remain engaged and supportive throughout the implementation process.
By ensuring frequent stakeholder communication, enterprises can sustain the momentum of their governance initiatives, making it the primary function of COBIT Implementation Phase 7
NEW QUESTION # 72
Which of the following includes capability levels that can be used as benchmarks?
- A. Process activities
- B. Process practices
- C. Process metrics
- D. Process purpose
Answer: B
Explanation:
In COBIT 2019, process practices are linked with capability levels. These levels can serve as benchmarks for evaluating the maturity and performance of processes.
"The COBIT process model provides detailed descriptions of governance and management objectives, including practices and activities, with defined capability levels that are used for performance measurement and benchmarking." Reference:COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, Introduction to Process Capability Levels
NEW QUESTION # 73
Which of the following BEST enables an enterprise to show and prove the benefits realized from the implementation of an EGIT program plan?
- A. Communicating the results and benefits in business impact terms
- B. Tracking expected benefits and targets until program implementation
- C. Delivering a solution from a long-term and complex project
- D. Adopting performance metrics that are easy to achieve
Answer: A
Explanation:
The COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide states:
"Effective communication of results and benefits in business impact terms is essential to obtain and maintain executive buy-in and to demonstrate the value of the EGIT initiative." Business impact communication aligns IT with business strategy and goals, which is crucial for proving and sustaining benefits realization.
Reference:COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Phase 7
NEW QUESTION # 74
Ensuring the program team knows and understands the enterprise goals is a part of which of the following implementation phases?
- A. What are the drivers?
- B. Where are we now?
- C. Where do we want to be?
- D. How do we get there?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Phase 1 - What are the drivers? focuses on establishing a shared understanding of why change is needed. This includes clarifying enterprise goals, strategic priorities, and stakeholder expectations.
Before assessing current state or defining a target state, the implementation team must understand what the enterprise is trying to achieve. Without this understanding, governance improvements risk being misaligned or ineffective.
The guide explicitly links drivers to enterprise goals, pain points, and trigger events. Ensuring the program team understands enterprise goals at this stage enables consistent decision-making throughout the implementation lifecycle and supports alignment between governance activities and business value creation.
NEW QUESTION # 75
Which of the following tools would be MOST useful for measuring and monitoring performance and the realization of benefits from an EGIT implementation program plan project?
- A. Gantt chart
- B. Project management software
- C. IT balanced scorecard
- D. RACI chart
Answer: C
Explanation:
The most useful tool for measuring and monitoring performance and the realization of benefits from an EGIT implementation program plan project is the IT balanced scorecard. The balanced scorecard provides a comprehensive view of performance across multiple dimensions, aligning IT objectives with business goals.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA01 (Managed Performance and Conformance Monitoring):This objective discusses the use of balanced scorecards to monitor and measure performance effectively.
* COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5:This chapter highlights the importance of performance measurement tools, including the IT balanced scorecard, for tracking progress and ensuring the realization of benefits from IT governance initiatives.
NEW QUESTION # 76
Which of the following industry sectors can be characterized by a low level of regulation and a high level of focus on cost?
- A. Health care providers
- B. Financial sector
- C. Public sector agencies
- D. Nonprofit enterprises
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to COBIT 2019's industry context insights:
"Nonprofit organizations typically operate under fewer regulatory constraints compared to heavily regulated sectors like finance or healthcare. However, they are highly cost-sensitive due to budget limitations and donor expectations." This combination makes nonprofits focused on cost-efficiency and operational value delivery, rather than regulatory compliance. In contrast, financial and healthcare sectors are bound by strict regulatory obligations and compliance oversight.
Reference:COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Section 4.4.1 (Industry Factors)
NEW QUESTION # 77
Which of the following should be a KEY consideration for an enterprise when refining the scope of the governance system in the third stage of the Governance System Design Workflow?
- A. Compliance requirements
- B. Current l&T-related risks
- C. Enterprise strategy
- D. The risk profile
Answer: C
Explanation:
In the third stage of the Governance System Design Workflow, refining the scope of the governance system involves aligning it closely with the overall strategic direction and objectives of the enterprise. COBIT 2019 emphasizes that the governance system should support the enterprise's strategy to ensure that I&T-related activities contribute effectively to achieving business goals.
Key considerations for refining the scope include:
Enterprise Strategy (Option A): The primary consideration is ensuring that the governance system aligns with and supports the enterprise strategy. This involves understanding the strategic objectives, goals, and priorities of the organization and ensuring that the governance system is designed to help achieve these strategic aims.
This alignment ensures that IT governance is not just a compliance exercise but a strategic enabler for business success.
Current I&T-Related Risks (Option B): While important, this factor is more about addressing immediate operational concerns and is typically considered earlier in the process to identify and mitigate significant risks.
The Risk Profile (Option C): Understanding the overall risk profile and risk appetite of the enterprise is crucial for shaping the governance system but is not the primary focus in the third stage. This aspect is usually addressed in earlier stages to ensure that the governance framework adequately covers risk management.
Compliance Requirements (Option D): Ensuring compliance is always a critical consideration, but like risk management, it is typically addressed earlier in the design process. Compliance requirements should be integrated into the governance framework but are not the key driver at the refining stage.
Thus, the correct answer isA. Enterprise strategy. By focusing on the enterprise strategy during the third stage of the Governance System Design Workflow, the governance system can be refined to support strategic initiatives, thereby ensuring that IT governance contributes directly to achieving business goals.
References:
ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution.
ISACA.
ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
NEW QUESTION # 78
When adapting the goals cascade of the COBIT 2019 framework, an enterprise with a growth strategy is MOST likely to select which of the following enterprise goals?
- A. Quality of management information
- B. Portfolio of competitive products and services
- C. Managed digital transformation programs
- D. Optimization of business process costs
Answer: B
Explanation:
When adapting the goals cascade of the COBIT 2019 framework, an enterprise with a growth strategy is most likely to select the enterprise goal "Portfolio of competitive products and services." This goal aligns with the enterprise's focus on growth through innovation and market competitiveness.
In COBIT 2019, the goals cascade is used to translate stakeholder needs into specific, actionable goals for IT governance and management. For an enterprise with a growth strategy, focusing on a competitive portfolio ensures that the organization is continually innovating and improving its products and services to capture market share and drive growth.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 5:Describes the goals cascade and how it aligns enterprise goals with IT-related goals and enablers.
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:Discusses how to adapt the goals cascade based on the enterprise's strategic objectives, such as growth.
By selecting the goal "Portfolio of competitive products and services," the enterprise can ensure that its IT initiatives support and drive its growth strategy.
NEW QUESTION # 79
What group is PRIMARILY responsible for setting the overall direction for IT governance implementation?
- A. Business owners
- B. Key stakeholders
- C. IT management
- D. Enterprise executives
Answer: D
Explanation:
The group primarily responsible for setting the overall direction for IT governance implementation is the enterprise executives. Their role is crucial in aligning IT governance with the strategic goals and vision of the organization.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, EDM01 (Ensure Governance Framework Setting and Maintenance):This objective discusses the responsibilities of enterprise executives in setting the governance framework's direction.
COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This chapter highlights the role of senior leadership in driving the implementation of IT governance.
Enterprise executives provide the strategic direction and support necessary to ensure that IT governance aligns with the enterprise's overall mission and objectives.
NEW QUESTION # 80
Which of the following involves numeric mapping tables created for each of the design factors?
- A. An architecture design approach
- B. A quantitative approach
- C. A qualitative approach
- D. A risk-based approach
Answer: B
Explanation:
In the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, it is clearly stated that:
"The more quantitative approach involves numeric mapping tables created for each design factor. The mapping tables quantify the descriptive values associated with each design factor, in order to indicate their correlation with governance and management objectives." These mapping tables typically contain values ranging from zero (0) to four (4), where four indicates maximum relevance of a governance or management objective with that particular design factor value, and zero indicates no relevance.
Reference:COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Section 4.3.1
NEW QUESTION # 81
What can management do to help ensure a planned IT initiative will meet future state objectives?
- A. Conduct stage gate reviews during implementation.
- B. Define operational performance metrics.
- C. Monitor key risk indicators (KRIs).
- D. Establish a return on investment (ROI)target.
Answer: A
Explanation:
To ensure a planned IT initiative meets future state objectives, management should conduct stage gate reviews during implementation. Stage gate reviews are a critical part of project management and governance, ensuring that projects are on track, meeting their objectives, and adhering to the planned schedule and budget.
Stage gate reviews are formal checkpoints at various phases of a project where progress is assessed, and decisions are made about whether to proceed to the next stage. These reviews help to ensure that:
The project remains aligned with business objectives and stakeholder expectations.
Risks are identified and managed effectively.
Necessary adjustments are made based on the current project status and future state objectives.
COBIT 2019 emphasizes the importance of governance and management practices to ensure successful project outcomes. Stage gate reviews align with COBIT's governance objectives by providing oversight, ensuring alignment with business goals, and enabling course corrections when needed.
COBIT 2019 Framework References:
COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI01 Manage Programs and Projects:
This objective highlights the importance of structured project management and governance practices, including stage gate reviews.
COBIT 2019 Design Guide:Emphasizes the need for effective monitoring and control mechanisms throughout the project lifecycle to ensure alignment with enterprise goals.
Conducting stage gate reviews is a proactive measure to ensure that IT initiatives stay on track and achieve their intended future state objectives, making it the best choice among the given options.
NEW QUESTION # 82
I&T-related issues should be considered as part of the design factors for a governance system in order to manage:
- A. risks that have already materialized.
- B. risks that have a high probability.
- C. risks that could materialize.
- D. risks that have a high impact.
Answer: C
Explanation:
I&T-related issues should be considered as part of the design factors for a governance system in order to manage risks that could materialize. This proactive approach allows the enterprise to identify and mitigate potential risks before they occur, enhancing the overall resilience and effectiveness of the governance system.
References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
* COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:This chapter explains the importance of considering I&T-related issues as design factors to address potential risks that could impact the governance system.
* COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO12 (Managed Risk):This objective emphasizes the need to identify and manage risks that could affect IT and business processes.
By addressing potential risks through the design of the governance system, enterprises can better prepare for and mitigate adverse events, ensuring smoother and more effective IT operations.
NEW QUESTION # 83
Which of the following roles creates policies and processes to ensure governance becomes business as usual?
- A. Internal audit
- B. IT management
- C. Risk, compliance and legal
- D. Business management
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to the COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives:
"Business management is responsible for embedding governance practices into the daily operations of the enterprise, ensuring that policies and processes are followed as standard practice." This helps institutionalize governance as a routine business activity.
Reference:COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives, Section EDM05
NEW QUESTION # 84
......
COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Study Guide Realistic Verified Dumps: https://prepaway.testkingpdf.com/COBIT-Design-and-Implementation-testking-pdf-torrent.html

